Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| -- | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 7.20 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro is much better than Galaxy S6 Active, having a 93.3 score against 80.9. IPhone 13 Pro comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy S6 Active works with Android 5.0 operating system. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixel amount per display inch.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a bit better CPU than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit and 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have a 64-bit processing unit, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also counts with more RAM memory.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a much less mega-pixels back facing camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture. Galaxy S6 Active features a bit better battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.