Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x |
| -- | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 8.47 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Galaxy S6 Active, having a 93.2 score against 80.9. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S6 Active comes with Android 5.0 OS. Galaxy S6 Active has a sharper display than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher pixels number in each display inch.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit and lesser cores (although faster), and they both have a 64-bits processing unit, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with more RAM.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4352mAh battery size. The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a way less mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.