Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 16.x |
| -- | 2022-09-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 8.47 ounces |
| -- | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 10.08 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a global score of 94.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's score of 80.9. IPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 OS. The iPhone 14 Pro Max features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor and an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 64 bits processor, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also counts with more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a more vivid screen than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of display. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a way more mega-pixels back camera and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4323mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Galaxy S6 Active, giving up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.