Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 has a score of 86.1, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 20 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version. The Galaxy S6 Active has a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Edge 20 has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits CPU and an extra graphics processing unit.
Motorola Edge 20 features a way better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.9 camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 also has a much more mega pixels back camera. Motorola Edge 20 has just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.