Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has an overall score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S6 Active's overall score of 80.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Lite has 11 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics processing unit.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a way better screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 20 Lite captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Lite has a superior battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.