Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, having a score of 92.8 against 80.9. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, giving a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a greater display density. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better processing unit than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
Motorola Edge 20 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way better video resolution. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a very superior storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.