Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.00 ounces |
| -- | Mineral Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge (2022) is just a bit better than Galaxy S6 Active, getting an 84.7 score against 80.9. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a more recent 12 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much sharper screen than Motorola Edge (2022), because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per screen inch. The Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Motorola Edge (2022) captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge (2022) also has a way more mega pixels camera and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Edge (2022) features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Motorola Edge (2022) is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.