Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| -- | 5.93 ounces |
| -- | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's design is somewhat thicker but incredibly lighter than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the previous 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bit CPU. The Galaxy S6 Active features a more vivid display than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features improved battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4400mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos, a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality photos and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.