Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| -- | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.00 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, having an 80.9 score against 80.9. Galaxy S6 Active's body is noticeably lighter but a little thicker than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S6 Active has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cores, a 64 bits processor and a GPU. Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better display than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also has a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a back camera with a way better 200 mega-pixels resolution.
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.