Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| -- | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| -- | Interstellar Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, with a score of 83.4 against 80.9. These phones work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 40 Pro has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, so it gives some nice extra features. Galaxy S6 Active features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a GPU and a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy S6 Active features a brighter display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a larger aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations, a lot larger sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photos, a much better video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.