Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.03 ounces |
| -- | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 score. Both devices we are comparing come with Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly better screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a little lower pixel quantity per inch of screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, it also counts with a bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processor and an additional GPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and a much better 50 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.