Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a score of 86.3, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 global score. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity in each inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also has a back camera with way more MP, a way bigger camera aperture and a much larger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.