Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting a general score of 87.1 against 80.9. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64-bit processing unit. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a larger aperture for better photography and video in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has greater battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.