Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Surfing blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a global score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's score of 80.9. Moto G 5G Plus's design has the same thickness than Galaxy S6 Active, but it's notably heavier. The Galaxy S6 Active features a bit better performance than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processor and an extra graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much more vibrant screen than Moto G 5G Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher screen density. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Moto G 5G Plus features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a way larger sensor, a larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.