Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.30 ounces |
| -- | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a overall score of 84.6 against 80.9. The Motorola One 5G body has the same thickness than the Galaxy S6 Active, but it is a lot heavier. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an incredibly better looking display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a slightly higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola One 5G features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage.
Motorola One 5G captures a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One 5G also has a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments and a lot more MP camera.
Motorola One 5G features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you want to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.