Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| -- | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G Ace is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting a overall score of 81.6 against 80.9. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and a graphics co-processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a way better display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a greater screen density. Motorola One 5G Ace shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a way more mega-pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations.
The Motorola One 5G Ace has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G Ace is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola One 5G Ace, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.