Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a score of 80.9, which is slightly better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 overall score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS, but the Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. Galaxy S6 Active has a superior hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a way better looking display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola One Hyper shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola One Hyper also has a camera with a lot better 64 MP resolution.
The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Hyper has a little better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S6 Active is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.