Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| -- | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola One Vision's 80.7 overall score. Galaxy S6 Active is a a bit thicker but noticeably lighter device than the Motorola One Vision. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much sharper display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S6 Active has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU. Motorola One Vision counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active and Motorola One Vision have extremely similar batteries duration. Motorola One Vision shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Vision also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a much more MP camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.