Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than Galaxy S6 Active, having an 87 score against 80.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2020) has newer 11 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way greater screen pixels density. The Motorola razr (2020) features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy S6 Active has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has less RAM memory, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy S6 Active counts with better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video, a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.