Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 15 |
| -- | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| -- | 7.02 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active is slightly better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), getting a score of 80.9 against 79.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the previous 5.0 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S6 Active has a much more vibrant display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller screen.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a much better performing processor than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 13 GB less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution, a lot higher video definition and a larger aperture.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.