Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a general score of 80.9 against 75.8. Galaxy S6 Active's design is much lighter and just a bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 Active has 5.0 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a little faster processing unit than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bit processor. The Galaxy S6 Active has a much more vibrant display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy S6 Active is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.