Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-10-05 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Green and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 576 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 (14 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53 (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.08 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A20s's 77 score. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy A20s has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's design is somewhat thicker but extremely lighter than Samsung Galaxy A20s.
The Galaxy S6 Active features an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The Galaxy A20s has a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A20s, because although it has less RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64 bits CPU. The Samsung Galaxy A20s features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy A20s counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a way smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a much worse image quality, a back-facing camera with less megapixels and a lot lower 1920x1080 video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.