Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than Galaxy S6 Active, having a overall score of 90.7 against 80.9. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with an incredibly better display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A52, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an extra GPU.
Samsung Galaxy A52 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A52 also has a much bigger camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures, a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.