Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12, 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is better than the Galaxy S6 Active's overall score of 80.9. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and an additional graphics processor.
Galaxy S6 Active features a much better display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Galaxy A52 5G features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography, a back camera with a much better 64 megapixels resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A52 5G features better battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 29% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.