Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52s is better than the Galaxy S6 Active, getting a 91.1 score against 80.9. Both phones in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52s has a newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing you lots of additional features. The Galaxy S6 Active has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better number of pixels per display inch and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S6 Active features a bit better processor than Galaxy A52s, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and a graphics processor.
The Galaxy A52s counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A52s also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low light environments, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Galaxy A52s counts with longer battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.