Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.51 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 has a general score of 87.7, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's score of 80.9. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M51 has the newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0. Galaxy S6 Active has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy S6 Active features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has 3 GB less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy M51 features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M51 has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has a much larger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a larger aperture to capture better photos in low light environments and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.