Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2020-02-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is better than the Galaxy S6 Active's overall score of 80.9. Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit processor. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with much more memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 29 percent larger battery size.
The Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.