Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| -- | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 8.08 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, having a 95.4 score against 80.9. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, but they are 0.35inches thick. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active and Galaxy S22 Ultra count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a way bigger screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a bit better processing power than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics co-processor. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor, a larger aperture, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a much higher video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.