Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having a 90.7 score against 80.9. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a lot larger screen. The Galaxy S25 Ultra captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a lot larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher video definition and a back-facing camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.