Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| -- | 9.03 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 576 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 Active has a global score of 80.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Galaxy S6 Active's body is incredibly lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has less RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64-bits processing unit.
Galaxy S6 Active has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. They have the same count of pixels per inch of screen, the same exact 2560 x 1440 resolution and a screen with the same size. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has greater battery life than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh. Galaxy S6 Active takes a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing lower quality videos and images and a way smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a camera in the back with lot more MP and a much higher (4K) video definition.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S6 Active is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.