Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-04-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 2.87 x 0.36 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Marine Blue and Moondust Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active is slightly better than the TCL 20 Pro 5G, getting an 80.9 score against 76.1. The Galaxy S6 Active body is just a little bit thinner and much lighter than TCL 20 Pro 5G. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S6 Active has an older 5.0 version while TCL 20 Pro 5G has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S6 Active features a much more vibrant screen than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater amount of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 224 GB more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better hardware performance than TCL 20 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a GPU and a 64-bits processor. TCL 20 Pro 5G features a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the TCL 20 Pro 5G also has a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The TCL 20 Pro 5G counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.