Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi 14T Pro is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting an 84.5 score against 80.9. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi 14T Pro has a more recent 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version. Galaxy S6 Active features a very superior processing power than Xiaomi 14T Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional graphics co-processor and a 64-bits processor.
Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per screen inch and a little worse 1220 x 2712px resolution, it also counts with a much bigger screen. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43 percent larger battery capacity. Xiaomi 14T Pro captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a much larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a larger aperture, a much better video definition and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.