Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| -- | 7.83 ounces |
| -- | Blasting black |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is better than Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 general score. Both phones we are comparing here have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has a really smaller screen and a bit worse 2560 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel density.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little bit better performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an additional GPU and a 64-bits processing unit. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos, a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality photos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.