Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Aurora blue, Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has a score of 90, which is much better than the Galaxy S6 Active's global score of 80.9. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro has newer 10 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, so it offers a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking screen than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S6 Active has a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way better resolution back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.