Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-29 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 8.25 ounces |
| -- | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a general score of 90.7, which is better than the Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 global score. Both phones we are comparing include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has the newer 11 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, counting with a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a little faster processor than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64-bits processor. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy S6 Active have really similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has a little bit lower screen pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra also has a much better video definition, a much larger sensor and a camera with a way better resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.