Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-08-20 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, getting a score of 82.7 against 80.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has 10 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, giving you some nice extra features. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy S6 Active, but it is noticeably heavier.
The Galaxy S6 Active features just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. Galaxy S6 Active has a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has a lot higher resolution camera, a larger camera aperture to take better low-light photography and videos and a way bigger sensor.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.