Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-04-03 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.67 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active, having an 83.8 score against 80.9. Galaxy S6 Active features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics processor.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels quantity per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower video resolution and a camera in the back with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a larger camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features just a bit better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery size.
Although Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.