Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-11-01 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.69 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Green |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has 5 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a lot better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lower video quality and a much lower 12.2 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.