Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-07-19 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| -- | 7.97 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a score of 84.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 overall score. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, offering some additional features. The Galaxy S6 Active has a much faster processor than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a graphics processing unit.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a lot lower quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2224 x 2488px and a really larger display. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 captures greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a back camera with lot more mega pixels, a way better video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 5100mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.