Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a global score of 87.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy S6 Active's general score of 80.9. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design has the same thickness than the Galaxy S6 Active, but it's notably heavier. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version.
The Galaxy S6 Active has a sharper display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy S6 Active features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional graphics co-processor.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a very superior camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a way bigger back camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.