Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-07-14 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| -- | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's global score of 78.7. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S6 Active has older 5.0 version while Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10 version. The Galaxy S6 Active features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better pixels count in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a bit better processor than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bit processor. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a superior storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal memory.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also has a camera with a much better resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light captures. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.