Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-09-08 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a score of 81.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's 80.9 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0 version, providing you a couple additional features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S6 Active features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and an extra GPU. The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality photographs and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 32 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a much longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.