Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2021-01-18 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| -- | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a score of 80.9, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's construction is way lighter and just a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with an incredibly better display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a way better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also has a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, a way larger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T has a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi 9T counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.