Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| -- | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy S6 Active, getting an 82.4 score against 80.9. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a newer 11 version while Galaxy S6 Active has Android 5.0, providing the user a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
Samsung Galaxy S6 Active features just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S6 Active counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, because although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processing unit and a GPU. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a better device, it costs a little more money than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.