Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.9 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 5.0 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2020-02-07 |
| 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black, Ochre and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 11.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 2560 x 1440 (Quad HD / 2K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has a general score of 80.9, which is a little bit better than the ZTE Axon 10s Pro's 76.6 global score. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 Active has the older 5.0 version and ZTE Axon 10s Pro has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active's construction is thicker but noticeably lighter than ZTE Axon 10s Pro.
Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a little better hardware performance than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a 64-bits processor and an additional GPU. Galaxy S6 Active has a much better looking display than ZTE Axon 10s Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel number in each screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S6 Active, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the ZTE Axon 10s Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. ZTE Axon 10s Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 14 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.