| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminium and Glass | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 252.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is a bit better than the Moto G200 5G, having a overall score of 87.4 against 86.2. Samsung Galaxy S6's construction is much lighter and a lot thinner than Moto G200 5G, even though it was released 7 years before. Both devices in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S6 has the previous 5.0 version and Moto G200 5G has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy S6 has a way better looking display than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the display and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S6 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a graphics co-processor.
The Motorola Moto G200 5G shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S6, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also has a camera with lot more megapixels. The Moto G200 5G and Galaxy S6 count with similar storage capacity to store more apps and games, both have the same internal memory.
The Moto G200 5G has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2550mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.