| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2016-07-28 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminium and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 252.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy S6 has an overall score of 87.4, which is much better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's score of 76.4. The Samsung Galaxy S6 design is a little thinner and somewhat lighter than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The Samsung Galaxy S6 counts with a superior processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit, a 64-bit processing unit and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S6 counts with a more vivid display than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a bit better display density. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Galaxy S6, and although the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a larger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition has much more storage for apps and games than Galaxy S6, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Moto Z Force Droid Edition features better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has a 37% more battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.