| Global Score | |
| 87.4 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 15 |
| 2015-04-11 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | -- |
| Aluminium and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 252.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 10.08 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy S6 is better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), with an 87.4 score against 79.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S6 has older 5.0 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. Galaxy S6 counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a really smaller display.
Galaxy S6 features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has 13 GB less RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a graphics processor and a 64-bits processor. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a much better camera than Galaxy S6, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger aperture to take better images in poorly lited environments and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S6, because it has 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 2550mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.