Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S6
SprintSM-G920P
| Global Score | |
| 87.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-04-11 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.78 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminium and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 252.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2550mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 is a bit better than LG V35 ThinQ, with an 87.3 score against 81.3. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy S6 is a lot older than LG V35 ThinQ, it's design is lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Galaxy S6 features a bit faster processing unit than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S6 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics processor.
The Galaxy S6 counts with a more vivid display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixel count per screen inch. The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ's camera is very similar to the camera in Samsung Galaxy S6, because although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same resolution camera in the back and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, it also counts with a larger aperture.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy S6 is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the LG V35 ThinQ.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.