Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. Apple iPhone 11's body is newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also just a little heavier. Apple iPhone 11 counts with a better performing CPU than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 also has more cores and a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter screen than iPhone 11, because although it has a bit smaller display and much less brightness, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a lot greater display pixel density. Apple iPhone 11 features just a bit better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same video definition, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with better 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 11, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB. The Galaxy S7 Active has longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 29 percent more battery capacity.
Although iPhone 11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 11, otherwise you can save some money and get the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.